Skip to content
The Visibility Bureau
Menu
The method

The Visibility Method

This is the whole process, published before you pay anything. Read it and judge whether it is worth the money. If a step does not apply to you, I will say so rather than bill for it.

Most agencies keep the method vague so the work sounds harder than it is. I would rather you understood exactly what you are buying. If you read this and decide to do it yourself, that is a fair outcome.

01

Visibility audit

I find out how search engines and AI assistants currently see you, and what is stopping them recommending you.

I crawl the site the way a search engine does, then check what an AI assistant actually says when asked the questions your buyers ask. Those two things fail for different reasons, so both get checked.

On the technical side I look at what can be crawled and indexed, what renders without JavaScript, how fast pages load on a mid-range phone, and whether the structure makes sense to a machine. On the visibility side I run a fixed set of prompts across the main AI assistants and log who gets named. Running them once proves nothing, because answers vary between identical queries, so the set is repeatable and becomes the baseline.

I also look at who is winning instead of you and why. Usually it is not magic. It is that they have covered a topic properly and you have not.

What you receive

  • A written audit, in plain language, not a 200 point tool export
  • A baseline of where you appear across the main AI assistants
  • A prioritised fix list, ordered by impact against effort
  • A walkthrough call where you can argue with any of it

What it needs from you

Access to your analytics and Search Console, and about an hour to talk through what you sell and to whom.

Typical time

Two working days.

02

Fix and build

I fix what the audit found, or build the site properly if fixing is throwing good money after bad.

Technical fixes come first, because content cannot rank on a site that cannot be crawled or that takes six seconds to load. That means crawl and index issues, Core Web Vitals, mobile rendering, and getting the core content into the raw HTML rather than behind scripts.

If the existing site is fighting you at every turn, I will tell you that a rebuild is better value than continued patching, and show you the reasoning. That is not always the answer. Plenty of sites are worth fixing.

Everything is built static-first where possible, which is why pages load quickly and why crawlers that do not run JavaScript can still read them.

What you receive

  • The technical fixes, shipped and verified
  • A site that passes Core Web Vitals on mobile
  • Content in the raw HTML, not injected by scripts
  • A before and after on every metric that changed

What it needs from you

Sign-off on design decisions, and content or approvals when asked.

Typical time

One to two months for a build, depending on complexity and urgency.

03

Make you citable

I structure your content so search features and AI assistants can lift it cleanly, and make your business easy to identify across the web.

Being quotable is mostly about writing a self-contained answer near the top of a section, then expanding. A passage that only makes sense if you have read the three paragraphs above it cannot be extracted. One that stands alone can.

Alongside that, your business needs to be consistently described wherever it appears. Same name, same description, same contact details, corroborated by sources that are not you. Engines resolve entities by cross-checking, so contradictions are what confuse them.

What I will not do here is sell you tactics the evidence does not support. I will not charge for llms.txt implementation, because Google has stated no AI system uses it and log studies found almost nothing requests it. I will not claim schema markup causes AI citations, because a controlled study found no such effect. Schema is worth doing for rich results and entity clarity, and that is how I will describe it.

What you receive

  • Answer-first content structure across the pages that matter
  • Structured data for rich results and entity clarity
  • A consistent entity footprint across the profiles that count
  • Crawler access checked, including for the AI search crawlers

What it needs from you

Subject-matter input. I can write it, but the expertise has to come from you.

Typical time

Runs alongside stage 2 and continues into stage 4.

04

Track and improve

I measure where you actually appear, month after month, and keep working on the gaps.

The baseline from stage 1 gets re-run on a schedule, so you can see movement rather than a snapshot. I report share of voice across a fixed prompt set, not a single lucky answer, because citations vary between identical queries and rarely repeat across engines.

Alongside that: rankings and impressions for the queries that matter, Core Web Vitals from real users, and the number that actually pays, which is enquiries.

What I will not do is claim credit for a specific citation. The top ten domains account for a small fraction of all AI citations, so the graph is a long tail and no agency can honestly attribute one mention to one action. I will show you the trend and be straight about what caused what.

What you receive

  • A monthly report in plain language, with the next actions
  • Share of voice across the main AI assistants, tracked against the baseline
  • Search visibility and enquiry numbers
  • An honest note on what moved and what did not

What it needs from you

Half an hour a month to review and decide priorities.

Typical time

Ongoing, monthly.

Honest limits

Where this method stops

  • I cannot guarantee a citation in any AI assistant. The engines decide, and their answers vary between identical queries. Anyone guaranteeing this is guessing or lying.
  • I cannot guarantee a ranking position. I can improve the factors that decide it and show you the movement.
  • This works slowly. Technical fixes land in weeks. Search and citation gains build over months as engines re-crawl and learn to trust the site.
  • If your product or offer is the problem, better visibility just gets more people to a page that does not convince them. I will say so rather than take the retainer.

There is a longer version of this: what I will not sell you , with the evidence behind each refusal.

Want this run on your site?

The audit is the sensible starting point. It is a fixed price, and you get the report and the plan whether or not you carry on with me.